If youre looking to make money online as a teen, look no further. Cashcrate has been the number one choice for 4 million people looking to make some extra money to supplement their income. The website itself is one of the cleanest, easiest to use interfaces out there which makes making money that much easier. Recently they have added a "how to guide" to help you make more money.
Under your name click on How To Guide and you will be directed to step by step guides to assist you in making money. Its now easier than ever. Have a great day everyone!! Cheers John
First off, if you arrived at this blog via a search engine check out my cashcrate proof of payment for $476.55. If you are a teen and are looking for a ways to make legit money online than this is the site for you. Okay, so today I thought I would answer a couple questions I have been receiving from teens lately about CashCrate and ways to make money online. 1.) I have been scammed before, what makes cashcrate so different? Before I joined CashCrate I was just like you. The thing about CashCrate though, is that they actually do pay. I am only 17 years old, yet I have made over $2500 with them in the past year. CashCrate is a great way to earn some extra money when you dont have a lot of time or money to work. 2.) How long should I expect to work if I want to make a lot of money? That answer depends. If you have some miracle system that will generate you a lot of referrals then all power to you. But for the rest of us, you can expect to work a couple hours each week if you are just completing offers. However, if you want to make the big bucks then you have to spend a lot of time writing articles, submitting them to article directories and just spending time on search engine optimization for your blog/website. 3. I made a blog but I have not gotten any referrals out of it, how come? This answer is simple. You either picked a bad keyword or you have not spent enough time getting quality backlinks. Believe me, it usually takes about 3 months before you start receiving any good traffic to your website from search engines. Just dont be a lazy teenager and youll be fine. 4. Am I going to receive any junk mail from paid online survey sites? Yes you will. Thats why I made a junk email when I was completing offers. If you use your real email address than your inbox will be flooded with promotional offers. You will also receive the occasional letter to your house, but those are generally few and far between. 5. How old do I have to be to join paid online survey sites? Most online survey sites require that you must be 18 years old to join them. However at CashCrate you only have to be 13 and that is why it is perfect for teens looking to make money online. 6. Is there a better way to make money online as a teen? Im sure there is, but they are probably scams. One site that I know isnt a scam is CashCrate. They have over 1.5 million members and have paid out millions of dollars to their members. If you have any other questions about paid online survey sites and make money online as a teen just leave a comment and Ill answer it.
MyAdvertisingPays - Is So Easy, You Dont Need To Own A Business To Start Making Money It really is as easy as:
1. Buy Credit Packs
2. Click on 10 ads every 24 hours
3. Repeat
4. Get in touch for more information.
Jack Ma, head of the Alibaba Group says this:"The worst people to serve are the Poor people. Give them free, they think its a trap.
Tell them its a small investment, theyll say they cant earn much. Tell them to come in big, theyll say no money.
Tell them try new things, theyll say no experience. Tell them its traditional business, theyll say hard to do.
Tell them its a new business model, theyll say its MLM. Tell them to run a shop, theyll say no freedom. Tell them to run a new business, theyll say no expertise.
They do have somethings in common:
They love to ask google, listen to friends who are as hopeless as them, they think more than an university professor and do less than a blind man. Just ask them, what can they do. They wont be able to answer you.
My conclusion: Instead of your heart beats faster, why not you just act faster a bit; instead of just thinking about it, why not do something about it. Poor people fail because of one common behaviour: Their Whole Life is About Waiting."
Once again, the (extremely) small minority of mud slingers have been at it with a mind numbingly dull and frankly uninformative article in the Sunday papers recently.
Now, hey what do I know about anything. Im fairly new to all this, but what I can tell you is MAP works, I have made and withdrawn money and intend to continue to do so.
I dont know why (well I have my theories) Advertising Executives with many years of experience running apparently busy successful Advertising Agencies, find the time or inclination to try and discredit My Advertising Pays.
Most people have failed chapters in their lives and most move on.
But, for some reason some folks reckon other peoples mistakes are far worse than their own.
Is it jealousy, have they missed the boat or is it badness - who knows, but spending time and energy in a bid to "Save us all", seems a little contrived.
Or are there other forces at work here, including a hint that they have the ultimate, most fantastic, totally legal, honest and trustworthy business that ever existed, and of course everything else is crap!
Of course everything in the internet is scam right?
Wrong, but who do you believe?
A couple of angry people with too much time on their hands (remember they have a hot line to the FBI - yeah right!)
or nearly 200,00 people all actively using the business, making money and showing as such with social proof.
Theres plenty to be found without me doing that here.
Theres nothing wrong with criticism and discussion, but mud slinging, name calling and trying to discredit ordinary folks trying to better themselves is sad and quite frankly, playground stuff!
Supply-side (or trickle down) economics has for the past few decades been one of the discreet tenets of Western economy. Its the belief that giving financial benefits to the wealthiest of society (in the way of tax cuts/breaks, regulatory advantages given to big businesses) will inevitably benefit society as a whole, as the wealth will trickle down the economic ladder in the form of employment, pay rises or whatever else of the extra wealth the richest will generously share with the rest of the population. Its been a policy the conservatives of America has held ever so close to their hearts, and one that has faced much opposition by the lower and middle classes of America. So how did trickle-down begin? A turning point was certainly in the 1980s, during the divisive periods when Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher were in power in the USA and UK respectively. Perhaps never have two leaders either side of the Atlantic been so harmonious- Reagan curiously dubbed Thatcher "the most important man in England", and Thatcher once described Reagan as "the second most important man in my life". The harmony of the two certainly extended to economic policy; both leaders were strongly influenced by the Chicagoan and Austrian schools of economics, the proponents of which included notable anti-regulation, free-marketers Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek. Trickle-down was one of their most prominent legacies. Thatcher and Reagan carried out drastic economic changes that were designed towards supply-side economics (another name for trickle-down). The most important relevant policy change was that of tax rate changes. In the USA, the Tax Reform of 1986 saw the top tax rate for individuals drop from 50% to 28%, partly compensated for by an increase of the bottom rate of tax from 11% to 15%. This was the very first time in the history of the USA that the top rate of tax fell at the same time as the bottom rate rising. In the UK, Thatcher followed suit by dropping the top rate of tax from 80% to 63%, meanwhile almost doubling VAT (Value-added tax) and the amount everyone had to pay to fund the National Health Service. However, she did indeed drop the common tax rate from 33% to 30%. So what were effects of these trickle-down policies? Lets remember, the motivation supposedly behind trickle-down economics was that the population as a whole would benefit from the wealthy being wealthier. The idea is that as the national wealth pie grows as a result of the richer getting richer, everyone elses pie would simultaneously grow as a result. So has it worked? Well, a certainly interesting effect is encapsulated well in the following graphic:
Comparison of wages of the top 1%, overall wages and productivity. (Mother Jones)
Note the real separation point on the graph, where the average income of the top 1% really lifts off- its after the turn of the decade, through the 1980s- conveniently the decade of Reagans presidency. Note not just how the income of the top 1% rises incredibly, that as productivity increases the average overall wages of the population lags behind, barely increasing in relation to the other two factors in the chart. The meaning of this is pretty unpleasant- the pie of wealth may have increased, but this chart suggests that more prominent has been a relocation of sorts of national wealth. The wages of the overall population has suffered since the 1980s when it is considered that productivity has boosted- the overall population have not benefited in terms of wages from this increase. Instead the wages of the wealthiest have been boosted far more than before the 80s. CEOs in 1965 made 24 times more than the average production worker- in 2009, this figure was 185. It seems clear that wages of the middle and lower classes, contrary to the motives of supply-side economics, have suffered as a result of the policy- meanwhile clearly the wealthiest have benefited HUGELY. So why havent most of the population benefited- a key belief of the theory is that its better for everyone if the wealthy are wealthier, right?
Buffett has been a prominent opponent of trickle-down economics.
Here there is a great fault in the trickle-down ideology- reduction in the taxes enforced upon the wealth is itself no guarantee of further reinvestment into the economy. This is because the benefits are being given to people who are not in need of it. Little is in the way of CEOs creating new jobs to further production- most already have the capital available to invest where they see fit. Warren Buffett (pictured right), one of the wealthiest men in the world, and perhaps the most prolific investor claimed"People invest to make money, and potential taxes have never scared them off". Taxes are rarely a stumbling block for the wealthiest, who are willing to take risks to invest (most entrepreneurs are where they are now as a result of their calculated risks). Therefore tax cuts to the wealthy rarely open the doors to new investments. Instead it leads to simply a further amassing of wealth by the wealthy. By no means will the wealthy invest everything they benefit from tax cuts, to the gain of the middle and lower classes as the theory suggests. A staggering example of this is how currently the top 1% of wealthiest people in the world control 39% of the worlds wealth. This is a clear sign of a broken global system, a large part of which is thanks to trickle-down. Trickle-down, supply-side, Reaganomics, whatever name it is called, is a lie. The solution lies not in blessing the wealthy with benefits and hoping that it will filter down to the rest of society, but the solution lies in the middle class. We need to make the middle the centre of our economic system, and see middle-out growth that will benefit everyone (yes, including the wealthy). Middle-out. That is the solution we need. Sources for this article can be found linked within.
Pop icon Taylor Swift has had a rocky time, to say the least, with the modern phenomenon of music streaming. Last July, she took a stand against streaming service Spotify, when she removed all of her music from the service and branded it as "undervaluing the art" that is music by offering free, ad-supported subscriptions. Swift cited in particular how underpaid artists putting their music onto the streaming service were, effectively making less than a cent per stream.
Many believed Swifts dramatic exodus from Spotify was simply a part of an exclusivity deal with Apple, and their recently announced service Apple Music. But it turns out this is far from the case, as a tumblr post just today from the 25 year old revealed. The post, titled "To Apple, Love Taylor", dealt to Apple what she had dealt to Spotify last year. In an unexpected move, Swift revealed she was not going to allow her music to be streamed on Apples service either.
Why? Unlike with Spotify, she does not discuss the lack of revenue an artist receives for each stream, rather the effect of the initial three month trial that Apple plans to grant users of the service. Swift called it "shocking, disappointing" that during these three months, Apple Music provides no revenue at all for the artists, as it receives no income from the user. And, according to herself, Taylor Swift is arguing not from her own position as a world-renowned star worth over $200m, but from the position of "the new artist or band that has just released their first single and will not be paid for its success", "the young songwriter", "the producer who works tirelessly". Essentially, Swift is putting forward the argument that the free 3 month trial being proposed by Apple to customers is putting smaller artists at a loss, failing to reward their efforts.
However, there are areas where I quite disagree with Taylor Swift. Firstly, she is correct about the lack of lucrative music streaming opportunities. Its no secret that despite its massive growth, Spotify has been finding difficulty in creating sustainable and spreadable profits. But is revenue really the priority of an artist, big or small, when they put their content onto streaming services such as Apple Music or Spotify? Swifts own friend Ed Sheeran disagrees with the notion of doing so with income being the primary motive. "Im in the music industry to play live," he claimed last year. "Thats why I put things on Spotify". He highlights his enjoyment of playing live, and indeed playing live is the far superior source of income for the significant majority of musicians both small and large. Sheeran sees the real value of streaming services, in how they provide a platform for artists to promote not just their music, but themselves- their merchandise, their YouTube channels and most importantly their live shows.
Like most artists, Taylor Swift derives most of her income from live shows- six months on the Red Tour in 2013 bringing her an estimated $30m. Justin Timberlake provides another example of how tours bring in far more revenue. In 2013, 39 shows made him over $40m, compared with a paltry $5m from combined streaming and album sales.
For smaller artists, there is a little difference. Streaming services are arguably a little young in this respect, but free media has more than shown its worth for smaller musicians, notably YouTube, from which the likes of Justin Bieber and recently Charlie Puth have found their fame. Apple Music and Spotify, with their ability to feature smaller talent, certainly has the potential to do the same for many other artists, and in that sense provide far greater value than just revenue from streaming.
And lets have a look at the impact of the three month trial in particular. Everyone knows the allure of a free trial. There is no doubt that more people will sign up to Apple Music because of it, and whether or not they leave after the trial is up is not of as much significance as we may think. Three months is quite a lot of time to explore and discover new music, to find new favourites and to support them, whether its through merch, buying their content or a ticket to their show. Of course, users wont be able to discover everyone in this three month period, but one has to realise that artists will certainly receive more traffic and attention when there is a larger group of streamers available to them- three months of this is better than none.
And lets not forget the power of a free trial to retain customers. Apple has very deliberately set a rather long free trial of 3 months (Spotifys is just a third of this). It gives users time to get themselves hooked. Streaming music, whether from your phone, tablet or computer, becomes part of your routine and three months is ample time for the streaming habit to settle in. Therefore it is very likely that a sizeable portion of Apple Music free-triallers will continue their subscriptions and pay for the service after the trial is up, providing the paid support that Swift wishes for.
Its important to note that Taylor Swift is not totally anti-streaming. She notes in her open letter that everyone knows that Apple "has the money to pay artists... for this three month trial period", and indeed this is true. Apple should cough up for the artists in this three month period.
But even if it doesnt pay out, its not entirely correct to argue that musicians, big or small, will not benefit at all from streaming, whether its Apple Music or Spotify. For the value of all types of music streaming clearly lies not in its money making capacity, but rather its ability to promote, to introduce artists and their work to vast amounts of new audiences. These new audiences, and the money that they spend buying merchandise, albums and live tickets are the most substantial, long-term rewards that streaming, free or paid, brings to artists.
So Taylor, making massive amounts of money from Apple Music or Spotify, as you know well, is probably a futile effort for most artists. But that doesnt mean theres no value, nothing to offer to artists, in these services.
As a teen or college student looking to make some extra money online, what better way then to hone in on your essay writing abilities you learned from school to earn to you some extra cash. Submitting articles to websites such as EzineArticles can yield you a serious profit...if you know what youre doing. Here are 6 ways to increase your profits when submitting articles.
1.) Promote Affiliate Products Promoting affiliate products is a great way to utilize article writing. You can promote products in your author bio and create commissions on all the sales you refer. However, make sure that you direct readers to a URL that you own, because directing them to a link you dont own will get your article deleted.
2.) Start a Mailing List Collect your website visitor names as well as emails and regularly email them a newsletter containing promotions to your website. This will keep readers updated on your content and have them coming back for more each week.
3.) Promote Your Website Promoting your website through article marketing is probably the most widely used goal of article marketing. In your bio, use a backlink to link directly to your website to your blog or website. You will get direct traffic from the article, as well as increased SEO which will increase your search engine rankings. Article marketing is one of, if not the best way to boost your backlinks.
4.) Start a Blog Begin publishing a blog. Blogs are regularly updated with fresh information and articles, so search engines often love them. Break up your larger articles and post several shorter ones each week.
5.) Content Sites With Adsense Use articles you submit to directories in order to gain visitors to your content blog/website. Pack your blog with tons of useful information and you are guaranteed to be lots free traffic. Use Adsense to place ads throughout your blog so you can monetize your traffic.
6.) Build Information Products This may take a while, but after you have created a good amount of useful articles, compile them into an e-book. Obviously change some things up here and there so the reader doesnt read the exact same articles again, but eventually you will be well on your way to selling an informative e-book.
There you have it! If you follow these tips you will surely be able to make a decent income with writing articles. Remember, work smarter and not harder. Good luck!
WRONG! MAP sells more advertising to external businesses than it does to its members, so money DOES come in from elsewhere.
Go ahead, try and explain it to me then!
Okay, heres how it works:
If MAP sold $10,000 worth of advertising to an external customer for example, they would keep 5% ($500), to pay for the running of the programme,
and the other 95% ($9,500), goes into a separate account. This account is the ‘reserve fund’ that is paid to us as Profit Share Earnings.
So, active members who buy advertising Credit Packs and click on just 10 ads daily will get a share of this money.
So for example, if you came to me, signed up and bought 50 Credit Packs (around $2,500)
As your sponsor on the PrimeTime membership level, I would earn 10% commission: $250
MyAdvertisingPays, would take 5% of the remaining money: $2,250 x 5% = $112.50
And, 95% of the remaining money would go to the Reserve Fund for Profit Share: $2,137.50
So now that you have 50 Credit Packs, you also get 27,500 Advertising Credits to use in the Traffic Exchange and there you can place an unlimited
number of adverts to wherever and whatever you like. Assuming an average Click Through Rate you will get around 3,000 visitors to your offers.
PLUS, if you remember to click on 10 ads each day, you also qualify for a share of that reserve fund. So as you have 50 Credit Packs, you would receivearound 50 x $0.50 (not fixed and just for this illustration – no guarantees ) per day = $25.00
Note; If it was a fixed payment of $0.50 it would take 120 days for your packs to pay out $60.00 each and expire, but they are not fixed.
So for now, let’s assume you keep earning $25 a day as you have 50 Credit Packs. Of the $25, 5% goes into your Advertising Fund ($1.25), and the remaining $23.75 goes into your Available Balance..
The same thing will also happen on the following day, as long as you clicked on 10 ads again.
Now, when you reach $49.99 in your Available balance, you can repurchase a new Credit Pack, which gives you more advertising Credits.
So, as you continue repurchasing (every time you reach $49.99) it gives you a never-ending supply of ad Credits, and as you end up with even more Credit Packs, you will get paid more more Profit Share from the Reserve fund.
Of course, you could let you money build up and withdraw it.
As the Reserve fund is a separate account from the MAP’s business account, should everyone choose to withdraw their earnings, it would not affect MAPs.
Now some would argue: Hey, if no external customers happened to buy advertising, and no internal customers bought advertising then yes, no money would come in, and therefore – no profit!
Err, Just like any business then– no selling, no earning.
However, the figures speak for themselves and the online advertising industry on the up:
BBC NEWS - GOOGLE PROFITS
The news article is about Google’s profits and share price rise based on the fact that advertising revenue is up.
But, in order to place ads on Google you need to open an AdWord account and fund it.
The difference with Google and MAP is Google KEEPS all the moneyfor themselves, MAP gives 95% back.
Sounds good to me, which is why I am currently earning
around $400 per day, and rising (results not typical).
If you want to get involved in the advertising revolution,
either to promote your offer or website, or to improve your SEO.
Lately I have been hearing a lot of people online calling the website Cashcrate a scam. And no matter how hard I try to convince them otherwise they still seem to think that it is a waste of time. Waste of time? I have been making money like this each and every month over the past 2 years....
$517.83
One of the main reasons that people think that CashCrate is a scam is that for some reason people think that they are just giving out money for free. Trust me, the money they give out isnt free, you are working for it just like any other job. Nothing in life is free and I love the people that think surveys sites just give out "free money".
The direct deposit statement I posted above is money straight from CashCrate that goes directly into my bank account every week. Now that money certainly isnt "free" and I had to work pretty hard to get that kind of money. Now in order to get started you need to create a unique blog/website like I have stated so many times in previous posts. As a teen I know it can seem pretty intimidating to go out and purchase your own url, but dont worry. There are many free blogging platforms that are extremely easy to set up and use. Make sure that your blog is unique and has well written content. There are thousands of websites out there promoting CashCrate so you have to make sure that yours sticks out from the crowd.
All in all, Cashcrate certainly is not a scam. It is a real company that has real members like me. They have paid out over 4 million dollars since they started back in 2006. I have received thousands of real dollars from them over the past 2 years. Now 99% of you reading this will probably sign up, maybe complete an offer and call it quits. Be that 1%!!! If you actually read the previous content I have written and stick to my advice you will be well on your way to earning money online as a teen.
In one of the most interesting run-ups to a Republican Presidential Nomination Election in recent history, multi-billionaire property magnate Donald Trump has emerged as an unexpected leader for many in the party.
Trumps initial announcement that he was running for President was trivialised by most commentators, as a publicity stunt by a man seeking to simply push further his name brand into the public spotlight. His failed 2012 campaign had also done little to convince anyone that Trump had the capacity to sustain a strong campaign to gain Republican nomination.
However, The Donald has surprised his doubters so far and currently stands head and shoulders above his Republican competitors in the polls. According to Newsweek, he is almost two times more popular among Republicans than his closest competitor, Jeb Bush, with a stunning 32% approval rating.
So, why is Trump doing so well in this election, when he failed miserably in the last? From his first step on the escalator down to his announcement speech, to his challenging the Pope in a recent interview with CNN, heres a look at 4 reasons why The Donald is coming up trumps in 2015.
1) He doesnt give a damn about PC, or general manners whatsoever.
To some, Donald Trump is a self-made business visionary to some, and to others a bombastic example of the evils of capitalism- but what is pretty much certain is that he is a bold, often divisive personality who is rarely afraid to say what is on his mind.
Some truly hilarious moments have emerged out of Trumps campaign as a result of his apparent lack of limits in what he says and does. Whether its giving out fellow Republican Lindsey Grahams personal number out during a speech, saying that he likes "people that werent captured" when John McCains time as a POW was being applauded by the public, or claiming that a female interviewer was on a period because she was asking him difficult questions, Trumps often wacky remarks have ensured him the public spotlight in recent months.
But there is a more serious side to Trumps lack of restraint (and views in general). Certain statements of his, notably his claim that immigrants from Mexico are mostly rapists and criminals ("some, I assume, are good people" he brazenly claims), suggest a darker side to Trump that did turn off a large proportion of the population- but at the same time must have had the opposite effect on others.
2) Hes rich.
Multi-millionaire 2012 Republican Candidate Mitt Romney became noted for his attempts to hide his wealth in the run up to the election, trying to shake off the Corporate Republican image that turned many voters off. Donald Trump, on the other hand, couldnt care less about showing that he is a man of the people- indeed, he believes his position high up in the economic ladder puts him in a perfect place to be President, and hes not afraid to show off the fact.
"Im proud of my net worth. Ive done an amazing job," announced Trump in his announcement speech, before revealing his supposed net worth of almost nine billion dollars.
The man is clearly unafraid to show off his wealth, and this works on many voters. Not only does it boost his image as a successful businessman (despite his numerous bankruptcies in the 1980s), thus reinforcing his claims to become the "greatest jobs president God ever created", but it creates an aura of aspiration, the American Dream, around Trump. Some people see Trump as a man who has succeeded in life, by achieving The Dream and becoming extremely wealthy, and these people take this to be a sign that he will be a similarly successful president.
Not only is his vast wealth helpful in this sense, but it proves a necessary boost in a political system in which money is king, for anyone who wishes to partake in it. For Trump, it seems his own money has come very handy indeed- during the second quarter of 2015, Trumps campaign raised $1.9m. Of this money, Trump had donated $1.8m. Yes, thats right. Just 1/19th of Trumps campaign donations came from people other than himself. More recently, Trump has announced that he would be willing to spend up to $1bn in his campaign to become President.
3) Hes a celebrity.
Donald Trump really likes his name.
Donald Trump is not just a person, but he is really a brand; as anyone who has visited his flagship Trump Tower knows, his name and image is a massive part of who he is (of course, as well as his money). Trump T-Shirts, Trump Teddy Bears, Trump Mugs- you can find an abundance of Trump goods in his New York skyscraper.
The man has also hosted the popular but also Celebrity Apprentice on NBC, and was the owner of the Miss Universe vanity competition.
Compare this with Trumps competitors. Before entering politics, Jeb Bush had positions in banking and oil companies and Rand Paul was a doctor. Marco Rubio has basically always been in politics. Trumps career is by far the most glamorous, something that by default is likely to win him some voters. People who liked him from The Apprentice, for example, are by far more likely to vote for him rather than his competitors.
Trump has for a long time worked in the television industry, one that relies almost entirely on approval, popularity. Therefore, he is likely to know what sells in the arguably similar political arena. His divisive comments may mean that the audience he attracts is not always going to be the same, but his audience may see a shift rather than a shrinking.
4) His policies are popular among Conservatives.
In a way (other than just his hair), Donald Trump reminds me a little of Boris Johnson. Behind all the buffoonery and show, there is a functioning Conservative mind that is proposing policies that do actually appeal to those on the right as much as they infuriate the left.
One of the things that really puts Trump on the map in the Republican Party is his stance on immigration, for example. This is clearly something he wants at the forefront of his campaign; as he stated in his announcement speech, he would "build a great, great wall" on the southern border between the USA and Mexico, to supposedly end the illegal immigration issue.
Putting aside the logic of his proposal beside (he claims he will build it "inexpensively", yet he will "have the Mexicans pay for that wall"- so whats the point of making it cheaply?), this solid anti-immigration approach has great appeal on the Conservative side.
His economic policies are also textbook Republican- push for lower taxes and less regulation on businesses.
And of course, a Republican candidate is incomplete until they make the typical announcement to put their mark on the Middle East- "Nobody will be tougher on ISIS than Donald Trump", according to the man himself.
With such issues in which there is a danger of anti-immigration proponents being branded politically incorrect, Mike Adams from Natural News comes to an interesting conclusion- that Trump is so popular because he is "the surrogate mouthpiece for the things most Americans deeply believe (but are too afraid to say)". While I am not so sure whether most Americans agree with him, it seems apparent that there are many in the USA who are in such a position.
But in being so honest and bold in his Conservative statements, Trump is running a dangerous risk of alienating even his supporters- his feud with his previous supporter Bill O Reilly, who now warns Trump will turn the Republican Party into one of racist brutalisers, suggests that Trump may be about to fall off his peak.
Read Donald Trumps announcement of his running for the Republican Presidential nomination here: http://time.com/3923128/donald-trump-announcement-speech/
